<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rooftop Wind Turbines: Throw Caution to the Wind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthforenergy.co.uk/200808/rooftop-wind-turbines-throw-caution-to-the-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthforenergy.co.uk/200808/rooftop-wind-turbines-throw-caution-to-the-wind/</link>
	<description>Cooking with solar energy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wind turbine</title>
		<link>http://earthforenergy.co.uk/200808/rooftop-wind-turbines-throw-caution-to-the-wind/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>wind turbine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthforenergy.co.uk/?p=12#comment-80</guid>
		<description>You are right. Rooftop wind turbine could reduce the tower cost. Tower cost is about 40-50% in samll wind turbines. However the rooftop wind turbine should pay attention to the noisy problem. So most of rooftop wind turbine is vertical axis wind turbine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. Rooftop wind turbine could reduce the tower cost. Tower cost is about 40-50% in samll wind turbines. However the rooftop wind turbine should pay attention to the noisy problem. So most of rooftop wind turbine is vertical axis wind turbine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
